Re: Greg's Decree! (was Re: Linus' decrees?)

[Greg Folkert]

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:03 -0500, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> Recently I ran across
> http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&safe=off&selm=1033074519.2698.5.
> camel%40localhost.localdomain
> 
> Is there a collection point for Linus' decrees?
> 
> The LSB (http://www.linuxbase.org/) seems to be mostly involved with
> how a distro is laid out, and not much to do with the kernel.

Okay, Linus decreed... oh yeah.

Exactly what is wrong with the method anyway?

You on Crack?

And no... that is not a decree in the traditional sense. It is more like
me saying:
        "I decree that Linus Torvalds is the lead maintainer of the
        Linux Kernel"

Make TONS-O-SENSE to state the obvious. IOW the statement was all meant
to say *DO IT THIS WAY AND NO OTHER* as nobody else honors any other
method.
-- 
greg, greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part