Re: ext2/3 files per directory limits

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Feb 23 2005 - 23:51:24 EST


Ron Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I would like to better understand ext2/3's performance characteristics.
>
> I'm specifically interested in how ext2/3 will handle a /var/spool/mail
> directory w/ ~6000 mbox format inboxes, handling approx 1GB delivered as
> 75,000 messages daily. Virtually all access is via imap, w/ approx
> ~1000 imapd processes running during peak load. Local delivery is via
> procmail, which by default uses both kernel-supported locking calls and
> .lock files.
>
> I understand that various tuning parameters will have an impact,
> e.g. putting the journal on a separate device, setting the noatime mount
> option, etc. I also understand that there are other mailbox formats and
> other strategies for locating mail spools (e.g. in user's home
> directories).
>
> I'm interested in people's thoughts on these issues, but I'm mostly
> interested in whether or not the scenario I described falls within
> ext2/3's designed capabilities.
>

noatime will help.

increasing the journal size _may_ help.

With 6k files per directory you'll benefit from indexed directories
(htree). Use `tune2fs -O dir_index'. dir_index isn't available for ext2.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/