Re: [PATCH] TCP-Hybla proposal

[Angelo Dell'Aera]

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:19 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Probably the best long term solution is to make the protocol choice
> be a property of the destination cache 

[..]
> The protocol choices are mutually exclusive, if you walk through the code
> (or do experiments), you find that that only one gets used.  As part of the
> longer term plan, I would like to:
> 	- have one sysctl
> 	- choice by route and destination
> 	- union for fields in control block


I think it should be nice if we substitute in the struct tcp_opt all the structs
related to the congestion control algorithms with a more generic one which could 
be initialized when the connection is open by reading just one sysctl which defines
the algorithm to be used. This could allow later even a user-space application to
set the congestion control it desires to use.   


> Is there interest in setting up a semi official "-tcp" tree to hold these?
> because it might not be of wide interest or stability to be ready for mainline
> kernel.

I perfectly agree.


--

Angelo Dell'Aera 'buffer' 
Antifork Research, Inc.	  	http://buffer.antifork.org
Metro Olografix

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html