Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is?

[Gene Heskett]

On Monday 21 February 2005 12:58, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>Am Montag, 21. Februar 2005 18:16 schrieb Gene Heskett:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> Motherboard is a biostar with nforce2 chipset, 2800xp cpu, gig of
>> ram.
>>
>> I've recently made the observation that while I can view 30fps
>> video from my firewire equipt movie camera with a minimal cpu hit
>> of 2-3%, but viewing the video from a webcam on a usb 1.1 circuit
>> takes 30-40% of the cpu, at half the frame rate.
>>
>> Do I have something fubar in the usb?  Or is this just the nature
>> of the beast?
>
>A video stream over usb1.1 must be compressed due to bandwidth
> available. Decompression needs cpu.
>
Thats what I was afraid of, which makes using it for a motion detected 
burgular alarm source considerably less than practical since the 
machine must be able to do other things too.  Darn.  And its usb1.1 
even when plugged into a 2.0 capable port.

One could probably use the FIR output of an EagleEye (X10 stuff) to 
start & stop a capture, but the lag inherent in that is less than 
'optimum' IMO.

Thank you Oliver.

> Regards
>  Oliver

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/