Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

[Sean]

On Fri, February 18, 2005 2:49 pm, Dmitry Torokhov said:

> You from cvs you can import into other SCM of your choise.

This isn't true unfortunately, a lot of information is lost in cvs.  file
deletes, renames etc..   Plus, the implementation from Bitkeeper is
lacking, (eg. combining many changes into one).

>
> Heh, you don't get to update the master repository even if you are
> using BK.  And you are free to update your local tree with
> CVS/SVN/whatever. So I am not sure why you trying this argument.

Yeah,  I didn't mean to suggest that it be opened up to the public :o) 
Just that the flow of information wouldn't all have to originate in bk to
make it into head (ie. bk could pull changes from head too).

Cheers,
Sean.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/