Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed
From: Sean
Date: Thu Feb 17 2005 - 19:03:01 EST
On Thu, February 17, 2005 6:54 pm, Lee Revell said:
> Ed did not say it was a choice between BK and nothing. He said "Linus
> has tried other SCMs. They did not suffice." Did you even read his
> comment?
The point you missed is that it's not an honest comparison to look at the
post BK/ pre BK situation and pretend that BK was the only option that
would have produced the list of benefits that Ed outlined. Linus has been
known to be wrong before.
> Please don't cc: me on this thread anymore, unless it's about some work
> you did to bring BK functionality to a free SCM.
No need to respond.
Cheers,
Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/