RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

[YhLu]

Yes. should not use prink(ERR.... 

YH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@xxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:22 PM
> To: YhLu
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken
> 
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu wrote:
> > forget about it. I found the reason:  I only put node 0 has 
> RAM installed.
> 
> There is some problem with this code - it complains on a few machines.
> However it's relatively harmless when this happens, so I 
> haven't looked it yet. Should perhaps take out the printk.
> 
> -Andi
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/