Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 11:15, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > I guess I'm wrong then - I thought the other changes avoided compilation
> > > > errors.
> > > 
> > > Well, yes, if you switch pm_message_t into struct. But we are not yet
> > > ready to do that... it is going to be typedefed to u32 for 2.6.11...
> > 
> > Ah. So I haven't realised that Bernard took your patches wholesale,
> > which is why we're fixing the compile errors too :>
> > 
> > Okay then, I guess the whole thing isn't urgent then?
> 
> Well, it would be nice to be able to switch to struct pm_message_t
> very soon in 2.6.12 cycle, so that it actually works in 2.6.12...

Okay.. but it can wait until post 2.6.11, right?

Nigel
-- 
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com

Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028      Mob: +61 (417) 100 574

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/