Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > Andrew, if you get one big patch doing only type-safety (u32 ->
> > >  pm_message_t, no code changes), would you still take it this late? I
> > >  promise it is not going to break anything... It would help merge after
> > >  2.6.11 quite a lot...
> > 
> > Problem is, such a megapatch causes grief for all those people who maintain
> > their own trees.  It would be best, please, to split it into 10-20 bits and
> > send the USB parts to Greg and the SCSI bits to James, etc.
> 
> Okay; I can do that if everyone is happy with the thing as a whole.
> Andrew, can I get your answer on Pavel's question - shall I just include
> the u32->pm_message_t part?

Yes, I believe it is too late to do anything than u32->pm_message_t
conversion that changes no code...
								Pavel

-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/