Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

From: Jeff Sipek
Date: Mon Feb 14 2005 - 10:09:26 EST



--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:08:58PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <lm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have
> > indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing
> > that they would never work on another SCM system. We can see how it
> > is possible that people would interpret the license that way but that
> > wasn't our intent. What we would like to do is change the language to
> > say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another
> > SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK. But after that you would be
>=20
> I don't even plan working on some SCM system, but being
> tainted for 1 year for just *using* BK is not worth the price IMHO.

I agree, the price is just too high. No matter how much I like BK, I
would give it up.

Jeff.

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCEL7kwFP0+seVj/4RAgK+AKDBogXpTt1qgKNZoB87feWAWFUeQwCeOmRL
lJ1EMgxDyXhOEvtzgIrsI18=
=C+jH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/