RE: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

[Sven Dietrich]

Hi George,

you may want to use this for reference.

This patch adds a config option to allow you to select whether timer IRQ runs in thread or not.

I'm not totally happy with the #ifdefs, but it may make witching back and forth easier.

Sven


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> George Anzinger
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 12:21 PM
> To: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: William Weston; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01
> 
> 
> If I want to write a patch that will work with or without the 
> RT patch applied 
> is the following enough?
> 
> #ifndef RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
> typedef raw_spinlock_t spinlock_t
> #define RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED
> #endif
> 
> 
> -- 
> George Anzinger   george@xxxxxxxxxx
> High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to 
> majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at  
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Attachment: common_timer_irqthread.patch
Description: Binary data