Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

From: George Anzinger
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 16:06:48 EST


I am seeing:
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x4974): In function `copy_mm':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/kernel/fork.c:493: undefined reference to `__spin_is_locked'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x9f5a): In function `next_thread':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/kernel/exit.c:877: undefined reference to `__raw_rwlock_is_locked'
net/built-in.o(.text+0x1258): In function `__sock_create':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/net/socket.c:175: undefined reference to `__spin_is_locked'
net/built-in.o(.text+0x16b54): In function `dev_deactivate':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/net/sched/sch_generic.c:594: undefined reference to `__spin_is_locked'
make[1]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2


Possibly from:
define __raw_spin_is_locked(x) (*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->lock) <= 0)
#define __raw_spin_unlock_wait(x) \
do { barrier(); } while(__spin_is_locked(x))
in asm/spinlock.h

should that be __raw_spin_is_locked(x) instead?
--
George Anzinger george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/