Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Feb 09 2005 - 23:15:57 EST


"Marcos D. Marado Torres" <marado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old
> acpi_power_off bug...
>
> ...
> diff -Nru -p1 linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mbn1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c 2004-12-24 22:35:01.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2-mm1-mbn1/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c 2005-01-26 00:26:54.000000000 +0100
> @@ -64,2 +64,9 @@ void device_shutdown(void)
>
> +#if 1
> + {
> + extern void do_acpi_power_off_prepare(void);
> + do_acpi_power_off_prepare();
> + }
> +#endif
> +

This of course doesn't compile if CONFIG_ACPI=n. I fixed that up.

Also, having acpi stuff in drivers/base/power/shutdown.c is quite
inappropriate.

Also, extern declarations should also not be placed in .c files - they
should go into header files which are shared by the definition and all
users of the symbol.

(I understand that it's only a "proof of concept" patch, but I thought I'd
bitch anyway ;))

So. I'll keep the patch as-is in -mm for now. I've Cc'ed linux-acpi.
Perhaps the people there can absorb this and fix it up for real, please?


From: "Marcos D. Marado Torres" <marado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:54:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Marcos D. Marado Torres" <marado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Please add to -mm the patch in attachment, since it solves the old
> > acpi_power_off bug...
>
> What acpi_power_off bug? And how does it solve it?

Here's the observed bug that the patch is trying to fix:
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041

What Marcos posted is a typo-corrected version of Eric Biederman's
patch:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110665542929525&w=2

In Eric's own words, the patch "needs some work before it goes into a
mainline kernel". AFAICT it's more of a proof-of-concept, just to see if
Eric's on the right track...

This is the motivation behind the patch:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110665405402747&w=2


--- 25-alpha/drivers/acpi/sleep/poweroff.c~acpi_power_off-bug-fix 2005-02-09 19:55:05.000000000 -0800
+++ 25-alpha-akpm/drivers/acpi/sleep/poweroff.c 2005-02-09 19:55:05.000000000 -0800
@@ -7,18 +7,37 @@

#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include "sleep.h"

static void
+acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
+{
+ if (system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF) {
+ acpi_wakeup_gpe_poweroff_prepare();
+ acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S5);
+ }
+}
+
+void
+do_acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
+{
+ if (!acpi_disabled) {
+ acpi_power_off_prepare();
+ }
+}
+
+
+static void
acpi_power_off (void)
{
printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
+#if 0 /* This should be made redundant by other patches.. */
/* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
- acpi_wakeup_gpe_poweroff_prepare();
- acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep(ACPI_STATE_S5);
+#endif
ACPI_DISABLE_IRQS();
acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5);
}
diff -puN drivers/base/power/shutdown.c~acpi_power_off-bug-fix drivers/base/power/shutdown.c
--- 25-alpha/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c~acpi_power_off-bug-fix 2005-02-09 19:55:05.000000000 -0800
+++ 25-alpha-akpm/drivers/base/power/shutdown.c 2005-02-09 20:10:21.000000000 -0800
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ void device_shutdown(void)
}
up_write(&devices_subsys.rwsem);

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ {
+ extern void do_acpi_power_off_prepare(void);
+ do_acpi_power_off_prepare();
+ }
+#endif
+
sysdev_shutdown();
}

_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/