Re: IRQ threading and non-generics

[Daniel Walker]

On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 23:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> eventually ARM should be merged to the generic IRQ subsystem and in the
> process it is very likely that the generic IRQ subsystem has to be
> changed to fit ARM's needs as well. But separating out new features and
> keeping the old ARM blob in place isnt the way this should be done - it
> will only prolong the pain.

	I agree that ARM should eventually merge with the generics, but this
shouldn't be a requirement for RT .. I've already shown that it isn't
needed for RT . 

	I don't want to create different IRQ threading code for each non
generic architecture .. It's possible to use common code without forcing
maintainers into a difficult situation.

Daniel

	

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/