Re: Preempt Real-time for ARM

[Ingo Molnar]

* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 10:36 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> 
> > The biggest point of discussion relates to the interrupts in threads
> > implementation. It is largely identical to what is implemented in the
> > generic irq handling. However, ARM doesn't not implement generic irq
> > handling, and will not support it in the near future. I am not in
> > support of two different threaded interrupt implementations. 
> 
> We have done the conversion to the generic irq handling and it works
> fine on a couple of machines. 

great - this would be a much preferred approach indeed.

> I'm just waiting until the new SMP bits are there before I have
> another go and clean up the missing SMP bits.

any chances for (most of) these bits going upstream as well? In any
case, the -RT tree can be a testbed for this.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/