Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Date: Sun Jan 30 2005 - 23:47:04 EST


In article <E1CvSuS-00056x-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
> > generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
> > have skb->dst set.
>
> Well caught. The same thing is needed for IPv6, right?

(not yet confirmed, but) yes, please.

Signed-off-by: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

===== net/ipv6/ip6_output.c 1.82 vs edited =====
--- 1.82/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c 2005-01-25 09:40:10 +09:00
+++ edited/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c 2005-01-31 13:44:01 +09:00
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@
to->priority = from->priority;
to->protocol = from->protocol;
to->security = from->security;
+ dst_release(to->dst);
to->dst = dst_clone(from->dst);
to->dev = from->dev;


--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/