Re: compat ioctl for submiting URB

[Christopher Li]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:33:31AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Looks reasonable from a first look.
> 
> Issues:
> - Should use CONFIG_COMPAT, not x86-64 specific symbols

Agree.

> - Why can't you set URB_COMPAT transparently in the emulation
> layer?  Then existing applications would hopefully work without
> changes, right?

The existing application is don't need to set the USB_COMPAT flag.
It is use internally to track the URB is submit from 32 bit user
space. I guess I don't have to use that flag.

> 
> You may also want to preserve the __user casts, otherwise
> Al Viro and other sparse users will be unhappy.

I did try. Which place are you referring to? I guess miss some of
it.

Chris

> 
> Thanks for attacking this long standing problem.
> 
> -Andi
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/