Re: [RFC][PATCH] add driver matching priorities

[Al Viro]

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:23:26PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Friday 28 January 2005 17:30, Adam Belay wrote:
> > Of course this patch is not going to be effective alone.  We also need
> > to change the init order.  If a driver is registered early but isn't the
> > best available, it will be bound to the device prematurely.  This would
> > be a problem for carbus (yenta) bridges.
> > 
> > I think we may have to load all in kernel drivers first, and then begin
> > matching them to hardware.  Do you agree?  If so, I'd be happy to make a
> > patch for that too.
> > 
> 
> I disagree. The driver core should automatically unbind generic driver
> from a device when native driver gets loaded. I think the only change is
> that we can no longer skip devices that are bound to a driver and match
> them all over again when a new driver is loaded.  

And what happens if we've already got the object busy?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/