Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

From: Wiktor
Date: Fri Jan 28 2005 - 15:26:13 EST


Hi,

We do test AUX port and your port appears to be perfectly functional
from the kernel point of view - it porperly responds to AUX_LOOP
commands, does not claim to support MUX mode and KBC properly sets
status register when asked to disable interface...

ok, but how AUX block KBD port? if procesor-interface works, it shouldn't disturb communication in any way! how it is possible that tests do not detect broken down port? if kernel enables it in some way (when disabling port from command line, KBD works ok), it should be detected that AUX does not work correctly and lock it somehow? can it be etermined by analyzing data flow? or maybe tests are not enought good, maybe some corelations when using both KBD and AUX exist and are not tested? as my keyboard works now, i'm not keen on solving this, but to make the world better and dominate it, some "runtime hardware failures handling" could be added.

--
May the Source be with you.
wixor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/