Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer

[Felipe Alfaro Solana]

On 27 Jan 2005, at 19:04, John Richard Moser wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What the hell?
>
> So instead of bringing something in that works, you bring something in
> that does significantly less, and gives no savings on overhead or patch
> complexity why?  So you can later come out and say "We're so great now
> we've increased the randomization by tweaking one variable aren't we
> cool!!!"?
>
> Red Hat is all smoke and mirrors anyway when it comes to security, just
> like Microsoft.  This just reaffirms that.

Please, keep politics out of this list and, instead, keep contributing 
with practical ideas and code.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/