Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

From: Russell King
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 03:29:30 EST


On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:32:07PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:48:53AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 08:03:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > I think I may be seeing something odd here, maybe a possible memory leak.
> > > The only problem I have is wondering whether I'm actually comparing like
> > > with like. Maybe some networking people can provide a hint?
> > >
> > > Below is gathered from 2.6.11-rc1.
> > >
> > > bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo
> > > 24
> > > ip_dst_cache 669 885 256 15 1
> > >
> > > I'm fairly positive when I rebooted the machine a couple of days ago,
> > > ip_dst_cache was significantly smaller for the same number of lines in
> > > /proc/net/rt_cache.
> >
> > FYI, today it looks like this:
> >
> > bash-2.05a# cat /proc/net/rt_cache | wc -l; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo
> > 26
> > ip_dst_cache 820 1065 256 15 1
> >
> > So the dst cache seems to have grown by 151 in 16 hours... I'll continue
> > monitoring and providing updates.
>
> Tonights update:
> 50
> ip_dst_cache 1024 1245 256 15 1
>
> As you can see, the dst cache is consistently growing by about 200
> entries per day. Given this, I predict that the box will fall over
> due to "dst cache overflow" in roughly 35 days.

This mornings magic numbers are:

3
ip_dst_cache 1292 1485 256 15 1

Is no one interested in the fact that the DST cache is leaking and
eventually takes out machines? I've had virtually zero interest in
this problem so far.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/