Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:19:41 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 07:38:48PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >...
> > Btw, where was comments about w1, kernel connector and acrypto? 
> > They were presented several times in lkml and all are completely new
> > subsystems.
> > Should I stop developing just because I did not get comments?
> >...
> 
> I sent you comments regarding w1 two months ago regarding:
> - the unneeded dscore -> ds9490r rename in the Makefile
> - completely unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's (that seem to be still unused today)
> 
> Being honest, I have to admit that your reactions didn't sound as if you 
> were waiting for comments.
> 
> > Thank you.

I greatly appreciate your comments, and they were addressed.
Part of exported symbols are unexported, patch is just waiting to be sent,
but I do not agree with dscore rename. I just do not understand it's advantage.

> cu
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> 
>        "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>         of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>        "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>                                        Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


	Evgeniy Polyakov

Only failure makes us experts. -- Theo de Raadt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/