Re: [ck] [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: RLIMIT_RT_CPU feature, -D7

[Cal]

Jack O'Quin wrote:
> You seem to have eliminated the mlock() failure as the cause of this
> crash.  It should not have caused it anyway, but it *was* one
> noticeable difference between your tests and mine.  Since
> do_page_fault() appears in the backtrace, that is useful to know.
>
> The other big difference is SMP.  What happens if you build a UP
> kernel and run it on your SMP machine?

Sorry for the delay, some sleep required. A build without SMP also 
fails, with multiple oops.
  <http://www.graggrag.com/200501271213-oops/>.

cheers, Cal

(NetEase AntiSpam+ at mail.edu.cn has been bouncing someone's copy)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/