Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 10:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:35:56AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > I have one rule - if noone answers that it means noone objects,
> > or it is not interesting for anyone, and thus noone objects.
> 
> That's simply not true.  The amount of patches submitted is extremly
> huge and the reviewers don't have time to look at everythning.
> 
> If no one replies it simply means no one has looked at it in enough
> detail to comment yet.

That is why I resent it several times.
Then I asked for inclusion.

I never send it to lkml just because simple static/non static + module
name
discussion in lkml already overflowed into more than 20 messages...

-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part