Re: [PATCH]sched: Isochronous class v2 for unprivileged soft rt scheduling

[Con Kolivas]

Jack O'Quin wrote:
> I still wonder if some coding error might occasionally be letting a
> lower priority process continue running after an interrupt when it
> ought to be preempted.

Well not surprisingly I did find a bug in my patch which did not honour 
priority support between ISO threads. So basically the patch only does 
as much as the original ISO patch. I'll slap something together for more 
testing with this fixed, and ISO_FIFO support too.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/