Re: [patch 1/13] Qsort

From: Andreas Gruenbacher
Date: Sat Jan 22 2005 - 17:13:12 EST

Next message: Jesper Juhl: "Re: [PATCH 00/11] Get rid of verify_area() - convert to access_ok()and deprecate."
Previous message: Jesper Juhl: "[PATCH] make loglevels in init/main.c a little more sane."
In reply to: Richard Henderson: "Re: [patch 1/13] Qsort"
Next in thread: Matt Mackall: "Re: [patch 1/13] Qsort"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 23:06, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> since you took the glibc one.. the glibc authors have repeatedly asked
> if glibc code that goes into the kernel will be export_symbol_gpl only
> due to their view of the gpl and lgpl

Sure, no big deal. We could equally well take the xfs one instead.

Cheers,
--
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX GMBH

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesper Juhl: "Re: [PATCH 00/11] Get rid of verify_area() - convert to access_ok()and deprecate."
Previous message: Jesper Juhl: "[PATCH] make loglevels in init/main.c a little more sane."
In reply to: Richard Henderson: "Re: [patch 1/13] Qsort"
Next in thread: Matt Mackall: "Re: [patch 1/13] Qsort"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]