Re: User space out of memory approach

[Mauricio Lin]

Hi Andrea,

I applied your patch and I am checking your code. It is really a very
interesting work. I have a question about the function
__set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) you put in out_of_memory
function. Do not you think it would be better put set_current_state
instead of __set_current_state function? AFAIK the set_current_state
function is more feasible for SMP systems, right?

BR,

Mauricio Lin.


On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:38:37 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > confirmed fix for this available. It was posted more than once.
> 
> I posted 6 patches (1/4,2/4,3/4,4/4,5/4,6/4), they should be all
> applied to mainline, they're self contained. They add the userspace
> ratings too.
> 
> Those patches fixes a longstanding PF_MEMDIE race too and they optimize
> used_math as well.
> 
> I'm running with all 6 patches applied with an uptime of 6 days on SMP
> and no problems at all. They're all 6 patches applied to the kotd too
> (plus the other bits posted on l-k as well for the write throttling,
> just one bit is still missing but I'll add it soon):
> 
>         ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/kernel/kotd/i386/HEAD
> 
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/