Re: [PATCH] relayfs redux for 2.6.10: lean and mean

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:27:43PM +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:15:28PM +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
> >
> >>Perhaps the logical solution is to implement debugfs in terms of relayfs?
> >
> >
> >What do you mean by this statement?
> 
> I mean that if, as you say, debugfs is very similar to relayfs only more 
> restricted (i.e. a debugging option) then it should be implementable as 
> an instance or specialization of the more general relayfs and that this 
> should be a better solution than two independent implementations of 
> similar functionality.

Ah.

No.

The implementations are not of the same functionality, or so Karim says.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/