Re: [PATCH 1/5] compat_ioctl call seems to miss a security hook

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Quoting r. Chris Wright (chrisw@xxxxxxxx) "Re: [PATCH 1/5] compat_ioctl call seems to miss a security hook":
> * Michael S. Tsirkin (mst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > I'm all for it, but the way the patch below works, we could end up
> > calling ->ioctl or ->unlocked_ioctl from the compat 
> > syscall, and we dont want that.
> 
> Hmm, I didn't actually change how those are called.  So if it's an issue,
> then I don't think this patch introduces it.
> 
> thanks,
> -chris

Sorry, you are right, we go to do_ioctl only if there are no
callbacks.
Patch looks good to go to me.
mst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/