Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

[Matt Mackall]

> > @@ -3211,6 +3211,12 @@ static inline task_t *find_process_by_pi
> >  static void __setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
> >  {
> >  	BUG_ON(p->array);
> > +	if (prio == 1 && policy != SCHED_NORMAL) {
> > +		p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
> > +		p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(-20);
> > +		p->prio = p->static_prio;
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> >  	p->policy = policy;
> >  	p->rt_priority = prio;
> >  	if (policy != SCHED_NORMAL)
> >
> 
> JACK actually uses three different priorities, the defaults are 9, 10
> and 20.  How about if I change this test?
> 
> 	if (prio <= 20 && policy != SCHED_NORMAL) {
> 
> Or, should that be?
> 
> 	if (prio > 0 && prio <= 20 && policy != SCHED_NORMAL) {

Or you can just drop the 'prio == 1 &&' part for this test. Ingo was
trying to be clever to allow some RT bits, but that's not really
necessary.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/