Re: iswraid and 2.4.x?

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:14:32 -0500, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:56:21 -0800 (PST), Martins Krikis
> > <mkrikis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>--- Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Check your inbox from months ago ;-)  AFAICS his current version
> >>>addresses all the comments from Alan and myself, from when it hit
> >>>lkml 6
> >>>months(?) ago...
> >>>
> >>>I'll give it another quick lookover though, sure.
> >>
> >>Jeff,
> >>
> >>As long as 2.4.30 is planned at all, I have no more
> >>worries for the moment. But if so, then please don't
> >>waste your time looking over the current version. In
> >>about a week there should really be another one out.
> >>It will add RAID10, and get rid of the "claim disks
> >>for RAID" mis-feature. I'll let everybody know, of course.
> >
> >
> > I'm just curious.  Is there already a possibility to use
> > RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels?
> 
> Intel or 'md' metadata?

Intel
 
> You need dmraid to use the Intel proprietary format.  I'm not sure if it
> supports RAID10 yet, but it supports the other levels.

I know about other levels, I'm asking about RAID10.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/