Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jack O'Quin <joq@xxxxxx> wrote:

> OK, I reran with just 5 processes reniced from -10 to -5.  On my
> system they were: events, khelper, kblockd, aio and reiserfs.  In
> addition, I reniced loop0 from -20 to -5.

> One major problem: this `nice --20' hack affects every thread, not
> just the critical realtime ones.  That's not what we want.  Audio
> applications make very conscious choices which threads run with high
> priority and which do not.

how much did this problem affect your test? Could the source of the 500
msec delays be the non-highprio components of the test that somehow
became nice --20?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/