[patch] avoid sparse warning due to time-interpolator

[David Mosberger]

The "addr" member in the time-interpolator is sometimes used as a
function-pointer and sometimes as an I/O-memory pointer.  The attached
patch tells sparse that this is OK.

Signed-off-by: David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@xxxxxxxxxx>

===== kernel/timer.c 1.109 vs edited =====
--- 1.109/kernel/timer.c	2005-01-11 16:42:35 -08:00
+++ edited/kernel/timer.c	2005-01-14 22:05:53 -08:00
@@ -1411,10 +1411,10 @@
 			return x();
 
 		case TIME_SOURCE_MMIO64	:
-			return readq(time_interpolator->addr);
+			return readq((void __iomem *) time_interpolator->addr);
 
 		case TIME_SOURCE_MMIO32	:
-			return readl(time_interpolator->addr);
+			return readl((void __iomem *) time_interpolator->addr);
 
 		default: return get_cycles();
 	}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/