Re: Kernel releases for security updates

[Alan Cox]

On Gwe, 2005-01-14 at 08:01, Frank Steiner wrote:
> I guess the new -as tree is more or less achieving what you want. If
> Andres gets enough support from other people, it might be possible to
> maintain even more than one or two former releases...

The problem is deciding what goes into such a tree. Do you go security
fixes only which nobody afaik is doing now, do you mix them with key
fixes and if so how far do you add fixes - thats a real PITA because you
can get odd clear fixes for minor problems (eg NFS df) that have never
been tested hard standalone. You can also get dependancies on
non-security fixes for security - -ac for example included my IDE work
to deal with the various IDE exploits/races. Though only minor security
wise there isn't a trivial fix for these with the broken locking in
Linus IDE and its going to take time for Bartlomiej to be happy with my
locking changes.


Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/