Re: [patch 02/11] uml: fix compilation for missing headers

[Jeff Dike]

blaisorblade_spam@xxxxxxxx said:
> If you think it cannot make sense to include both <sys/ptrace.h> and
> <linux/ptrace.h> (as userspace process, i.e. host includes), go
> complaining with glibc, or follow the linux-abi includes idea.

> However, the compilation failure is possibly glibc-version (or better
> glibc includes version) related - what I now is that the failure
> happens on my system with a glibc 2.3.4 (from Gentoo).

> Also, remove some syscalls from the syscall table, since some syscalls
> were added which are only inside -mm currently, and this prevents
> currently compilation. 

Hold off on this one.  I have different fixes for this in my tree.

The system ptrace headers (asm/ptrace.h, sys/ptrace.h, linux/ptrace.h) have
varying effects, depending on distro and architecture.  So, I decided to put
sysdep/ptrace_user.h in charge of supplying the system ptrace information to
the rest of UML.  This has some ripple effects which I am in the process of
sorting out.

On the system calls, I have them indef-ed depending on whether one of the
__NR_vperf symbols are defined.  This will go away when the entry points
are in both -mm and -linus.

				Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/