Re: [PATCH] let fat handle MS_SYNCHRONOUS flag

From: OGAWA Hirofumi
Date: Wed Dec 29 2004 - 22:06:47 EST


Robert Hardy <rhardy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Colin Leroy wrote:
>> On 25 Nov 2004 at 22h11, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>>>> Thank you for your help. Do I push to Andrew?
>>> I have some patches which conflict with this patch. So, I'll
>>> submit the patches after fixing it.
>> Ok. I suppose you'll handle the vfat one too?
>
> I am very interested in seeing this sync vfat patch committed.
>
> Can you please provide current status on vfat sync support?
>
> Also are there newer patches for the vfat support?

Currently, the many buffers is still not writing synchronously. And I'm
rewriting the update-path for an update dependency and some optimization,
now.

Current patches is here.

[I'm offline from today to January 2 or 3.]

Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: patchset.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data