Re: [lkdump-develop] Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/7] Diskdump 1.0 Release

[Takao Indoh]

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:45:13 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

>>
>> I think kexec-dump is not stable yet.
>
>Do you have any facts to back this up? Is your project more stable ?
>What is the success rate of dumps of diskdump ? How does that compare to
>kexec-dump under the same circumstances ?

Sorry, a word "stable" was not appropriate. I meant that kexec-dump was
under development yet. kexec-dump works well on i386/x86_64, but it is
in the development stage on other architectures.

>> I heard that kexec-dump of
>> some architecture (ex. ia64) had some problems and not worked.
>
>wouldn't it be better to then help finish that rather than making an
>alternative ? 

It is, if diskdump project just started now. But the basic code of
diskdump is almost completed. I think it is more efficient to enhance 
quality of diskdump than help kexec-dump.

Best Regards,
Takao Indoh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/