Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 2/10 CKRM: Accurate delay accounting

From: Greg KH
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 16:41:48 EST


On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:46:53AM -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
> @@ -912,6 +915,9 @@
> extern void set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, char *from);
> extern void get_task_comm(char *to, struct task_struct *tsk);
>
> +#define PF_MEMIO 0x00400000 /* I am potentially doing I/O for mem */
> +#define PF_IOWAIT 0x00800000 /* I am waiting on disk I/O */
> +

Mix of tabs and spaces :(

> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> extern void wait_task_inactive(task_t * p);
> #else
> @@ -1111,6 +1117,86 @@
>
> #endif
>
> +/* API for registering delay info */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DELAY_ACCT
> +
> +#define test_delay_flag(tsk,flg) ((tsk)->flags & (flg))
> +#define set_delay_flag(tsk,flg) ((tsk)->flags |= (flg))
> +#define clear_delay_flag(tsk,flg) ((tsk)->flags &= ~(flg))
> +
> +#define def_delay_var(var) unsigned long long var
> +#define get_delay(tsk,field) ((tsk)->delays.field)
> +
> +#define start_delay(var) ((var) = sched_clock())
> +#define start_delay_set(var,flg) (set_delay_flag(current,flg),(var) = sched_clock())

You mixed tabs and spaces here. Just use tabs please.

> +#define add_delay_clear(tsk,field,start_ts,flg) \
> + do { \
> + unsigned long long now = sched_clock();\
> + add_delay_ts(tsk,field,start_ts,now); \
> + clear_delay_flag(tsk,flg); \
> + } while (0)

-ENOTABS

> +#else
> +
> +#define test_delay_flag(tsk,flg) (0)
> +#define set_delay_flag(tsk,flg) do { } while (0)
> +#define clear_delay_flag(tsk,flg) do { } while (0)
> +
> +#define def_delay_var(var)
> +#define get_delay(tsk,field) (0)
> +
> +#define start_delay(var) do { } while (0)
> +#define start_delay_set(var,flg) do { } while (0)
> +
> +#define inc_delay(tsk,field) do { } while (0)
> +#define add_delay_ts(tsk,field,start_ts,now) do { } while (0)
> +#define add_delay_clear(tsk,field,start_ts,flg) do { } while (0)
> +#define add_io_delay(dstart) do { } while (0)
> +#define init_delays(tsk) do { } while (0)
> +#endif
> +

It's that key over there on the left hand side of the keyboard...

> +/* Changes
> + *
> + * 24 Aug 2003
> + * Created.
> + */

No changelogs in files again please.

> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_TASKDELAYS_H
> +#define _LINUX_TASKDELAYS_H
> +
> +#include <linux/config.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct task_delay_info {
> +#if defined CONFIG_DELAY_ACCT
> + /* delay statistics in usecs */
> + uint64_t waitcpu_total;
> + uint64_t runcpu_total;
> + uint64_t iowait_total;
> + uint64_t mem_iowait_total;
> + uint32_t runs;
> + uint32_t num_iowaits;
> + uint32_t num_memwaits;
> +#endif
> +};

A null structure otherwise? Why?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_DELAY_ACCT
> +int task_running_sys(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + return task_is_running(p);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_running_sys);
> +#endif

So LGPL code can use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/