Re: Suspend 2 merge: 34/51: Includes

[Matthew Garrett]

Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I can see that it might look that way, but it's actually fundamental to
> the support for building as modules (which is required for LVM &
> encryption), and has been really helpful in creating clear distinctions
> between the different parts of suspend. It also provides a clear method
> for someone to add support for their new wizz-bang storage method or
> compressor.

I'm not entirely clear on this. Surely all that's needed for LVM and
encryption support is for that to be set up in userspace and then allow
userspace to trigger a second attempt at resume? I have a hacky patch
for swsusp that allows that (at the moment it just adds a "resume"
method to /sys/power/state), which gives you the functionality without
the module pain.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.linux-rutgers.kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/