Re: [PATCH] Sync in core time granuality with filesystems

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Nov 26 2004 - 19:01:57 EST


On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 01:43:40AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > diff -urpN -X ../KDIFX linux-2.6.10rc2/fs/jfs/namei.c linux-2.6.10rc2-time/fs/jfs/namei.c
> > --- linux-2.6.10rc2/fs/jfs/namei.c 2004-10-19 01:55:28.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.10rc2-time/fs/jfs/namei.c 2004-11-21 23:27:52.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static int jfs_rename(struct inode *old_
> > old_ip->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> > mark_inode_dirty(old_ip);
> >
> > - new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
> > + new_dir->i_ctime = new_dir->i_mtime = current_fs_time(new_dir->i_sb);
> > mark_inode_dirty(new_dir);
> >
> > /* Build list of inodes modified by this transaction */
> > @@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ static int jfs_rename(struct inode *old_
> >
> > if (old_dir != new_dir) {
> > iplist[ipcount++] = new_dir;
> > - old_dir->i_ctime = old_dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
> > + old_dir->i_ctime = old_dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
>
> Is this supposed to be CURRENT_TIME_SEC?

No, JFS supports nanosecond resolution. The first hunk could
stay at CURRENT_TIME, but it doesn't matter much (would be just
a small optimization)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/