Re: [PATCH] Compound page overhaul

[Greg Ungerer]

Hi David,

David Howells wrote:
> Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > The refcounting has been annoying me for a while, it just feels
> > wrong. It has been done that way for a very long time (since 2.4.0
> > IIRC). I am sure there was more to it back in the 2.4 but I don't
> > think we need to do it like this any more.
>
>
> It was like that in 2.4 also - where I first developed this arch and these mm
> changes. The refcount-on-free bug is there also. I don't know why no one else
> has hit it.
>
>
> > I don't have any problem with what David has done so far though
> > I need to test it more extensively first.
>
>
> That'd be great! :-)
>
> I need to look at dumping my 2.4 arch & changes into the 2.4-uc kernels too.

That would be good :-)

Regards
Greg



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Chief Software Dude       EMAIL:     gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear -- a CyberGuard Company            PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/