Re: [PATCH] Remove pointless <0 comparison for unsigned variable infs/fcntl.c

[Jesper Juhl]

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > Shutting up gcc is not the primary goal here, the goal is/was to  
> > a) review the code and make sure that it is safe and correct, and fix it 
> > when it is not.
> > b) remove comparisons that are just a waste of CPU cycles when the result 
> > is always true or false (in *all* cases on *all* archs).
> 
> Well, I'm convinced that (b) is unnecessary, as any compiler that notices 
> the range thing enough to warn will also be smart enough to just remove 
> the test internally.
> 
That makes sense. I'll try and ignore (b).

> But yes, as long as the thing is a "review and fix bugs" and not a quest 
> to remove warnings which may well be compiler figments, that's obviously 
> ok.

That was the main thing, yes. Of course I may make mistakes and end up 
posting patches that are less than perfect, but review and fix bugs is 
my intent, building with -W is merely a way for me to find relevant bits 
to review.

But enough of this, I understand your views on the issue and thank you for 
your examples, now I'll focus on the code and see if it results in a few 
patches :)


--
Jesper Juhl



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/