Re: [PATCH] Compound page overhaul

[David Howells]

William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I had to fix it to make it work, but what's currently lurking in
> > Andrew's tree seems more or less correct, just not necessarily safe.
> 
> Pardon my saying so, but "correct, but unsafe" sounds a bit oxymoronic. =)

True.

> Unless FRV is surprisingly more widely distributed than it appears,
> it's unclear it will do much to help the CONFIG_MMU=n testing level.

Also true. It certainly won't hurt to get other archs (both MMU and !MMU
testing this patch).

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/