Re: deferred rss update instead of sloppy rss

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Mon Nov 22 2004 - 18:22:45 EST


Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > The page fault code only increments rss. For larger transactions that
> > > increase / decrease rss significantly the page_table_lock is taken and
> > > mm->rss is updated directly. So no
> > > gross inaccuracies can result.
> >
> > Sure. Take a million successive pagefaults and mm->rss is grossly
> > inaccurate. Hence my suggestion that it be spilled into mm->rss
> > periodically.
>
> It is spilled into mm->rss periodically. That is the whole point of the
> patch.
>
> The timer tick occurs every 1 ms.

That only works if the task happens to have the CPU when the timer tick
occurs. There remains no theoretical upper bound to the error in mm->rss,
and that's very easy to fix.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/