Re: Linux 2.6.9 pktgen module causes INIT process respawning and sickness

[Lincoln Dale]

Jeff,

At 04:06 AM 23/11/2004, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> I've studied these types of problems for years, and I think it's possible 
> even for Linux.

so you have the source code --if its such a big deal for you, how about you 
contribute the work to make this possible ?

the fact is, large-packet-per-second generation fits into two categories:
 (a) script kiddies / haxors who are interested in building DoS tools
 (b) folks that spend too much time benchmarking.

for the (b) case, typically the PPS-generation is only part of it.  getting 
meaningful statistics on reordering (if any) as well as accurate latency 
and ideally real-world traffic flows is important.  there are specialized 
tools out there to do this: Spirent, Ixia, Agilent et al make them.

> [..]
> I see no other way for OS to sustain high packet loading about 500,000 
> packets per second on Linux
> or even come close to dealing with small packets or full 10 gigabite 
> ethernet without such a model.

10GbE NICs are an entirely different beast from 1GbE.
as you pointed out, with real-world packet sizes today, one can sustain 
wire-rate 1GbE today (same holds true for 2Gbps Fibre Channel also).

i wouldn't call pushing minimum-packet-size @ 1GbE (which is 46 payload, 72 
bytes on the wire btw) "real world".  and its 1.488M packets/second.

> The bus speeds are actually fine for dealing with this on current hardware.

its fine when you have meaningful interrupt coalescing going on & large 
packets to DMA.
it fails when you have inefficient DMA (small) with the overhead of setting 
up & tearing down the DMA and associated arbitration overhead.



cheers,

lincoln.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/