[2.6 patch] Use -ffreestanding? (fwd)

[Adrian Bunk]

Hi Andrew,

for the kernel, it would be logical to use -ffreestanding. The kernel is 
not a hosted environment with a standard C library.

Linus agreed that it would make sense.

The gcc option -ffreestanding is supported by both gcc 2.95 and 3.4, 
which covers the whole range of currently supported compilers.

Could you add the patch below to the next -mm to see whether there are 
any problems I didn't find?

TIA
Adrian



Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>

--- linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm4-full-ffreestanding/Makefile.old	2004-11-09 22:27:06.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm4-full-ffreestanding/Makefile	2004-11-09 22:27:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -349,7 +349,8 @@
 CPPFLAGS        := -D__KERNEL__ $(LINUXINCLUDE)
 
 CFLAGS 		:= -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
-	  	   -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
+	  	   -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
+		   -ffreestanding
 AFLAGS		:= -D__ASSEMBLY__
 
 export	VERSION PATCHLEVEL SUBLEVEL EXTRAVERSION LOCALVERSION KERNELRELEASE \



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/