Re: sparse segfaults

[Mitchell Blank Jr]

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >Actually, this is documented gcc behaviour,[...]
> >you can do
> >	int tickadj = *ptr++ ? : 1;
> >and it's well-behaved in that it increments the pointer only once.
> 
> And it's specific to GCC. This kinda ruins some tries to get ICC working on the
> kernel tree :)

By ICC do you mean the Intel compiler?  It's supported the GCC Extension
"Conditionals with Omitted Operands" since at least version 5.0.1.  See:
  http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/c50/linux/comp501.pdf

-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/