Re: [discuss] Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86

[Andi Kleen]

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:50:50AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:55 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > Can you show some examples? We don't have this for any other
> > > architecture.
> > 
> > Just grep for any use of X86 in Kconfig.
> 
> OK, I'll pick the first I find...
> 
> config ATP
>         tristate "AT-LAN-TEC/RealTek pocket adapter support"
>         depends on NET_POCKET && ISA && X86
> 
> Why is that OK on x86_64 but not Alpha? Why isn't the use of X86 a bug
> in that case?

I don't know details about the driver, but it's not enabled on x86-64 
because x86-64 doesn't have ISA set.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/