Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET

[Chris Wright]

* James Morris (jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Chris Wright wrote:
> 
> > Why not make a unix_seq_sendmsg, which is a very small wrapper?
> 
> Good idea, patch forthcoming.
> 
> > Does the above stop the other issue?  My laptop died, so I'm not able to
> > test ATM.
> 
> No, it seems to be caused when addrlen in sendto() is non-zero, causing 
> unix_find_other() to be called instead of unix_peer_get(), which is 
> screwing up reference counts.

Right, but the snippet I posted guards against that I think.  It forces
unix_peer_get() in dgram_sendmsg.

> As for MSG_EOR, apart from the generic socket code, nothing is being done.  
> This would be a separate issue.

Yup, just noting the bits that looked broken to me.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/