Re: [PATCH] [Request for inclusion] Filesystem in Userspace

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > Coda should do the job, too... What are advantages of FUSE over Coda?
> 
> No, it couldn't do the job half as well.  You know, I did use Coda,
> until I had enough of it.  Now look at how many userspace filesystems
> were written based on CODA and how many on FUSE.

Well, there are filesystems based on NFS, which just plain do not
work... So #filesystems is not quite good argument.

> Coda is very different.  You can only read/write whole files in Coda.
> It's got a different attribute invalidation modell, a different access
> checking modell.  Generally it's much less flexible, which is OK since

I know I've asked before... but how is the "fuse-userspace-part
swapped out and memory full of dirty data on fuse" deadlock solved?

Coda has at least the advantage that coda-userspace-part does not need
to be page-locked.
								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/